Tags
4th preference I-130 8 U.S.C. Section 1153 203(h)(3) 203(h) of CSPA does not limit automatic conversion and retiention of priority date to those seeking conversion of family based petitions age-out aged out ameliorative reading of CSPA amnesty avoid interpreting statutes to render any portion of the statute redundant can my child benefit under CSPA children Child Status Protection Act Client Comments come here legally Congress CSPA coverage derivative benefits as a child derivative of a petition economy election employer who refuses to pay fair wages enforcement fixes foreign workers taking American jobs go to the back of the line H-1B cap H-1B jobs H-1B limit H-1B lottery H-1B reform H-1B visas ICE immigrants immigrants compliment US workers immigrants don't take jobs away from Americans immigration immigration reform impact of immigrants on the economy In re: Kin Na Kim In re rodolfo Avila-Perez jobs Jyoti Patel legalization Matter of Cuellar de Osorio Matter of Garcia Matter of Patel Matter of Wang military motion to stay action naturalization NC Padash v. INS plain meaning of CSPA priority date retention priority date retention request recession reform unlawful presence urge the BIA to follow Matter of Garcia USCIS revised guidance on the applicability of the child status protection act visa lottery wait turn in line Wilmington
Viewing entries tagged with '8 U.S.C. Section 1153'
Top 10 fixes No. 6 – Apply Child Status Protection Act to aged-out children as it was intended
Posted by Helen Jugovic on 15 June 2009 | 9 Comments
Tags: Child Status Protection Act, Matter of Garcia, Matter of Patel, age-out, aged out, priority date retention, USCIS revised guidance on the applicability of the child status protection act, derivative of a petition, can my child benefit under CSPA, immigration reform, CSPA coverage, 203(h)(3), derivative benefits as a child, In re: Kin Na Kim, In re rodolfo Avila-Perez, Matter of Wang, Matter of Cuellar de Osorio, plain meaning of CSPA, 8 U.S.C. Section 1153, priority date retention request, 4th preference I-130, motion to stay action, Jyoti Patel, 203(h) of CSPA does not limit automatic conversion and retiention of priority date to those seeking conversion of family based petitions, avoid interpreting statutes to render any portion of the statute redundant, Padash v. INS, ameliorative reading of CSPA, urge the BIA to follow Matter of Garcia, come here legally, wait turn in line, go to the back of the line
This is about the Child Status Protection Act, and why our courts, consulates, and the US Citizenship & Immigration Service need to start applying the law as it was intended to protect certain children’s rights in the immigration process. This blog entry is NOT about the “Dream Act” or about creating new visa categories for undocumented children.
