Viewing entries tagged with 'jobs'
Posted by Helen Jugovic on 16 February 2009 | 0 Comments
Tags:
H-1B reform,
H-1B limit,
H-1B cap,
H-1B lottery,
visa lottery,
H-1B visas,
H-1B jobs,
foreign workers taking American jobs
H-1B visas are granted each year to professional foreign workers, each of whom needs to be sponsored by a U.S. company that couldn't find an American worker who has the needed skills. But that quota for each year is typically filled before the fiscal year even begins, resulting in a computerized, random lottery with a 15-30% chance of an employer's petition for a worker being accepted for processing. The result is that small and large businesses can easily lose out, after going through all the paperwork requirements 6-8 months ahead of time, paying USCIS goverment application filing fees up to $3320 per worker, and exhausting human resources efforts to hire qualified talent for their businesses. Starting with the Immigration Act of 1990, Congress arbitrarily fixed the numerical limit, referred to as a cap, for the number of H-1Bs that would be available each year. The H-1B cap was set at 65,000 per year. Several exemptions from this H-1B cap have been added via subsequent legislation, the most important of which is 20,000 visas for persons holding a U.S. Master's degree. The cap was temporarily increased from 1999 to 2003, reaching a maximum of 195,000 per year. But since 2004, the cap was reduced back to the 65,000/20,000 limits.
| Read the full post
Posted by Jeremy McKinney on 17 December 2008 | 0 Comments
Tags:
immigration,
reform,
amnesty,
jobs,
economy
Right now it takes four to five years for a permanent resident to sponsor a spouse or minor child (unless you are from Mexico, where it takes seven to eight years). It takes five to six years for a U.S. citizen to sponsor an adult child (unless you are from Mexico, where it takes over 15 years). It takes five to six years for an employer to sponsor a skilled worker for permanent residency. See Visa Bulletin.
Why so long? The reason is because Congress sets numerical caps on the number of immigrant visas which can be issued each year. None of us have a problem with providing a limit on legal immigration each year. The problem is that the current number is not realistic when compared with demand, and the visas are divided for all countries, although there is much more legal immigration with certain countries (like Mexico and India). Is it realistic to expect a Mexican permanent resident (or Mexican-American) in this country to be separated from his or her family for so long? Is it realistic to expect an American business to wait a half a decade to get a worker they need now? The result of the status quo is more undocumented family members and workers - a perpetuation of dangerous trips through the deserts of the Mexican-American border and our current black market of illegal workers building homes and landscaping business property.
| Read the full post
Posted by Jeremy McKinney on 21 October 2008 | 1 Comments
Tags:
immigration,
reform,
amnesty,
jobs,
economy
It is our hope at McKinney & Justice, PA to not only use our website to market our services, but also to illustrate to our friends and colleagues how broken our current immigration system remains. The issue of immigration reform remains one of the central challenges of our time for several reasons.
First, the issue is central because how we shape our immigration policy directly impacts our remaining American manufacturing and production. If business cannot meet its labor needs in America, jobs will continue to leave America. Many opponents of immigration and globalization scream, "They’re taking our jobs!" The reality is that (a) support jobs follow talent and every time we lose a talented scientist or researcher due to our immigration policy, we lose the support jobs as well, and (b) when business can’t find enough able and willing U.S. workers and current policy delays or prevents the sponsoring of guest workers, the entire operation shuts down and Americans lose their jobs. India and China benefit, and American workers lose.
Second, immigration reform is central to our national security. Our country has millions living in the shadows. If we are truly concerned about national security, we need to offer the undocumented incentives to come forward and be accountable. Accountability includes address registration, biometrics, and criminal background checks. The current system is a modern-day "Wild West," where we deport 250,000 aliens while 400,000 or so sneak in each year.
Finally, immigration reform is central to restoring America’s standing in the world. For most of our history, America has been the symbol of freedom and opportunity around the world. As the US Conference of Catholic Bishops put it, "people come from all over the world seeking opportunity in the United States[.] We know their names and faces; they are in our parishes, schools and Catholic Charities agencies. … Justice and prudence demand that we treat them with dignity and find a reasonable way for their contributions and presence to be recognized within the law." Each time we unjustly deny asylum to a person in need or break up families for the sake of mindlessly enforcing a fundamentally flawed set of laws, our image is tarnished. At the same time, we need laws; we need a secure border; we need to know who is in our country and why. Revising, not eliminating our immigration laws, can address our central challenge. And it can be done without a blanket amnesty. Over the next couple of weeks, I’ll be outlining what’s wrong and how we can fix it. Our firm would love to have your comments.
| Read the full post
